And you can’t see that there might be a reason for that? An occupied person having every right to fight the occupier and if you think Israel is innocent of that then take a look at what’s happening in the West Bank where there is no Hamas. Does Israel have the right to steal Palestinian home and land? Imagine what Israel would do if Pale…
And you can’t see that there might be a reason for that? An occupied person having every right to fight the occupier and if you think Israel is innocent of that then take a look at what’s happening in the West Bank where there is no Hamas. Does Israel have the right to steal Palestinian home and land? Imagine what Israel would do if Palestinians had the power to steal Israel’s land. Or yours.
God vs. Satan is a matter of faith, and faith is not about truth.
What, pray tell, is "platitudinous" about my statement—in the context of "there is ALWAYS two sides to a story"? The "believer" (or even the biased one) BELIEVES one story or the other. The "seeker" SEARCHES for the truth in one story or the other or somewhere in between.
There are always two sides to a story. The truth does not *always* lie somewhere in between. Sometimes one party is lying and the other is telling the truth. I used Satan and God in my example simply because they are archetypes.
And you can’t see that there might be a reason for that? An occupied person having every right to fight the occupier and if you think Israel is innocent of that then take a look at what’s happening in the West Bank where there is no Hamas. Does Israel have the right to steal Palestinian home and land? Imagine what Israel would do if Palestinians had the power to steal Israel’s land. Or yours.
There is ALWAYS two sides to a story.
Zionists: "There's no place like someone else's home."
And the truth is usually hidden somewhere in between.
Is it? When God is fighting Satan do you think the truth lies somewhere in between?
I'm not suggesting that this is necessarily a case of God vs Satan, but wanted to illustrate the somewhat platitudinous nature of your assertion.
God vs. Satan is a matter of faith, and faith is not about truth.
What, pray tell, is "platitudinous" about my statement—in the context of "there is ALWAYS two sides to a story"? The "believer" (or even the biased one) BELIEVES one story or the other. The "seeker" SEARCHES for the truth in one story or the other or somewhere in between.
There are always two sides to a story. The truth does not *always* lie somewhere in between. Sometimes one party is lying and the other is telling the truth. I used Satan and God in my example simply because they are archetypes.