God vs. Satan is a matter of faith, and faith is not about truth.
What, pray tell, is "platitudinous" about my statement—in the context of "there is ALWAYS two sides to a story"? The "believer" (or even the biased one) BELIEVES one story or the other. The "seeker" SEARCHES for the truth in one story or the other or somewhere in between.
God vs. Satan is a matter of faith, and faith is not about truth.
What, pray tell, is "platitudinous" about my statement—in the context of "there is ALWAYS two sides to a story"? The "believer" (or even the biased one) BELIEVES one story or the other. The "seeker" SEARCHES for the truth in one story or the other or somewhere in between.
There are always two sides to a story. The truth does not *always* lie somewhere in between. Sometimes one party is lying and the other is telling the truth. I used Satan and God in my example simply because they are archetypes.
God vs. Satan is a matter of faith, and faith is not about truth.
What, pray tell, is "platitudinous" about my statement—in the context of "there is ALWAYS two sides to a story"? The "believer" (or even the biased one) BELIEVES one story or the other. The "seeker" SEARCHES for the truth in one story or the other or somewhere in between.
There are always two sides to a story. The truth does not *always* lie somewhere in between. Sometimes one party is lying and the other is telling the truth. I used Satan and God in my example simply because they are archetypes.