The first lie of the zionist propagandists was that "israel has a right to defend itself." This is actually a lie under international law.
israeli settlers on occupied land actually don't have a right to defend themselves.
This is an extremely uncomfortable fact for zionists to contend with, as is the fact that more children were abducted by israel on 10/6 than the total number of hostages taken on 10/7.
Israelis had a right to defend themselves on October 7th when the attack was happening. Of course they did. Individual people being attacked always have a right to defend themselves. But the idea that "Israel has a right to defend itself" doesn't make sense, since Israel is a concept, an idea (like all countries). Also, using an atrocity as an excuse to go in and kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians and starve tens of thousands more doesn't meet any reasonable definition of self-defense.
They surely did not. Permanent occupation is illegal, and waaaay downstream from that is the bullshit you're regurgitating. Wipe the vomit off and take a fresh look.
It is my understanding that an occupying force has the responsibility to protect the indigenous people, but they don't have a right to defend themselves? That doesn't sound logical to me. Regardless, I wish the Khazarian "Semites" would find a vacant island somewhere to occupy by themselves and quit fkg with everyone else.
The first lie of the zionist propagandists was that "israel has a right to defend itself." This is actually a lie under international law.
israeli settlers on occupied land actually don't have a right to defend themselves.
This is an extremely uncomfortable fact for zionists to contend with, as is the fact that more children were abducted by israel on 10/6 than the total number of hostages taken on 10/7.
Israelis had a right to defend themselves on October 7th when the attack was happening. Of course they did. Individual people being attacked always have a right to defend themselves. But the idea that "Israel has a right to defend itself" doesn't make sense, since Israel is a concept, an idea (like all countries). Also, using an atrocity as an excuse to go in and kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians and starve tens of thousands more doesn't meet any reasonable definition of self-defense.
Meh. All of Gaza is full of terrorist infrastructure. The Gazans know this. Maybe you don’t.
They surely did not. Permanent occupation is illegal, and waaaay downstream from that is the bullshit you're regurgitating. Wipe the vomit off and take a fresh look.
If you are human, then congratulations. You beat the reverse Turing test. I can't tell if you're a bot or not.
It is my understanding that an occupying force has the responsibility to protect the indigenous people, but they don't have a right to defend themselves? That doesn't sound logical to me. Regardless, I wish the Khazarian "Semites" would find a vacant island somewhere to occupy by themselves and quit fkg with everyone else.
Well- the ICJ just agreed with me. 🤷♂️