Israelis had a right to defend themselves on October 7th when the attack was happening. Of course they did. Individual people being attacked always have a right to defend themselves. But the idea that "Israel has a right to defend itself" doesn't make sense, since Israel is a concept, an idea (like all countries). Also, using an atrocity…
Israelis had a right to defend themselves on October 7th when the attack was happening. Of course they did. Individual people being attacked always have a right to defend themselves. But the idea that "Israel has a right to defend itself" doesn't make sense, since Israel is a concept, an idea (like all countries). Also, using an atrocity as an excuse to go in and kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians and starve tens of thousands more doesn't meet any reasonable definition of self-defense.
They surely did not. Permanent occupation is illegal, and waaaay downstream from that is the bullshit you're regurgitating. Wipe the vomit off and take a fresh look.
Israelis had a right to defend themselves on October 7th when the attack was happening. Of course they did. Individual people being attacked always have a right to defend themselves. But the idea that "Israel has a right to defend itself" doesn't make sense, since Israel is a concept, an idea (like all countries). Also, using an atrocity as an excuse to go in and kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians and starve tens of thousands more doesn't meet any reasonable definition of self-defense.
Meh. All of Gaza is full of terrorist infrastructure. The Gazans know this. Maybe you don’t.
They surely did not. Permanent occupation is illegal, and waaaay downstream from that is the bullshit you're regurgitating. Wipe the vomit off and take a fresh look.
If you are human, then congratulations. You beat the reverse Turing test. I can't tell if you're a bot or not.