14 Comments
тна Return to thread

"Direct evidence of covert action" is an oxymoron

No it isn't. What was covert in the past could obviously be exposed after the fact with direct evidence.

I see your circumstantial evidence. I don't buy it as at all conclusive (and especially not 2) but if you do, ok.

Expand full comment

He seems to have been ostracized plenty. I've seen Greenwald called a traitor and "lost to the right" plenty of times.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Dec 28, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

OK, you win. Greenwald is a spy.

Expand full comment

haha case closed. Now off with his head >> oh wait on, shouldn't we do Gates and Fauci, first ; then Tedros and Baric, Trudeau and Ardern , then the entire UN and WHO so many before Greenwald

Expand full comment

No, no, every revolution is about low hanging fruit.

Expand full comment

Good good, I should be able to help. totally indiscriminate terror, yes good, there are so many of them , its nearly mid night to New Year here in Bangkok, I will start tomorrow. I've never heard of a decent excuse for a Thai person to be Thai yet, but they're almost Chinese anyway so that's it.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Dec 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I could name one, but why get bogged down in the specifics of a particular scenario? It's perfectly obvious that some events can remain secret and not be public knowledge for a period, and then later be exposed by documents or other primary evidence that was, for example, released by a whistle-blower. Giving an example of this to demonstrate it is absurd.

Lots of people have been on Tucker Carlson, for a hundred reasons - people he agrees with, does not agree with, argues with or likes, boring or interesting, Left or Right, one time guests or regular guests. The range is huge and framing his appearance on there as a "reward" and as evidence for his treachery is weak to the point of irrelevancy.

As said to you above, throwing around controlled opposition-like accusations is not helpful.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Dec 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

OK I concede. Greenwald and Tucker are both definitely, without any doubt, Deep State. My waiting for something more concrete before concluding this was a mistake, this was an example of my not "questioning narratives" and I apologise.

Expand full comment

It was more than a mistake, it was proof of your own collusion in his evil plot.

You are disinvited from my bowling league for un-American activities.

Expand full comment

To be clear, the disinvitation is the RESULT of your un-American activities. It is not that my bowling league participates in un-American activities. It is physically impossible for bowling to be un-American, unless the alley is teetotal.

Expand full comment

Tucker is jewish of course but is he aligned with Z1on?. I can't see it .easily.

Expand full comment