I could name one, but why get bogged down in the specifics of a particular scenario? It's perfectly obvious that some events can remain secret and not be public knowledge for a period, and then later be exposed by documents or other primary evidence that was, for example, released by a whistle-blower. Giving an example of this to demonst…
I could name one, but why get bogged down in the specifics of a particular scenario? It's perfectly obvious that some events can remain secret and not be public knowledge for a period, and then later be exposed by documents or other primary evidence that was, for example, released by a whistle-blower. Giving an example of this to demonstrate it is absurd.
Lots of people have been on Tucker Carlson, for a hundred reasons - people he agrees with, does not agree with, argues with or likes, boring or interesting, Left or Right, one time guests or regular guests. The range is huge and framing his appearance on there as a "reward" and as evidence for his treachery is weak to the point of irrelevancy.
As said to you above, throwing around controlled opposition-like accusations is not helpful.
OK I concede. Greenwald and Tucker are both definitely, without any doubt, Deep State. My waiting for something more concrete before concluding this was a mistake, this was an example of my not "questioning narratives" and I apologise.
To be clear, the disinvitation is the RESULT of your un-American activities. It is not that my bowling league participates in un-American activities. It is physically impossible for bowling to be un-American, unless the alley is teetotal.
I could name one, but why get bogged down in the specifics of a particular scenario? It's perfectly obvious that some events can remain secret and not be public knowledge for a period, and then later be exposed by documents or other primary evidence that was, for example, released by a whistle-blower. Giving an example of this to demonstrate it is absurd.
Lots of people have been on Tucker Carlson, for a hundred reasons - people he agrees with, does not agree with, argues with or likes, boring or interesting, Left or Right, one time guests or regular guests. The range is huge and framing his appearance on there as a "reward" and as evidence for his treachery is weak to the point of irrelevancy.
As said to you above, throwing around controlled opposition-like accusations is not helpful.
OK I concede. Greenwald and Tucker are both definitely, without any doubt, Deep State. My waiting for something more concrete before concluding this was a mistake, this was an example of my not "questioning narratives" and I apologise.
It was more than a mistake, it was proof of your own collusion in his evil plot.
You are disinvited from my bowling league for un-American activities.
To be clear, the disinvitation is the RESULT of your un-American activities. It is not that my bowling league participates in un-American activities. It is physically impossible for bowling to be un-American, unless the alley is teetotal.
Tucker is jewish of course but is he aligned with Z1on?. I can't see it .easily.