I wouldn't trust a single word of anything you read on Wikipedia, it's run by the CIA/FBI (and no doubt MI6).
Anything that has political implications is to be taken with a heavy dose of skepticism. Glenn Greenwald's Wiki entry is said to be a classic example.
I think the mutable nature of everything on the Web is surely obvious to everyone by now, 'reading between the lines' is now an archaic observation.
I used to edit some politically neutral articles on Wikipedia, and although there is editorial disagreement, the end product is factual. The issue arises with interpretation of facts.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
I wouldn't trust a single word of anything you read on Wikipedia, it's run by the CIA/FBI (and no doubt MI6).
Anything that has political implications is to be taken with a heavy dose of skepticism. Glenn Greenwald's Wiki entry is said to be a classic example.
I think the mutable nature of everything on the Web is surely obvious to everyone by now, 'reading between the lines' is now an archaic observation.
I used to edit some politically neutral articles on Wikipedia, and although there is editorial disagreement, the end product is factual. The issue arises with interpretation of facts.