I can’t tell whether or not your comment is sarcasm, but regardless of which is the case, it is an interesting theory. But it is almost certainly wrong. After reading and re-reading this post a few times and reading most of his comments here, it is pretty obvious that he has swallowed the official narrative of 10/7, hook, line and sinker…
I can’t tell whether or not your comment is sarcasm, but regardless of which is the case, it is an interesting theory. But it is almost certainly wrong. After reading and re-reading this post a few times and reading most of his comments here, it is pretty obvious that he has swallowed the official narrative of 10/7, hook, line and sinker. If he is in fact sympathetic to the 10/7 Truthers, he did such a poor job of conveying that that he should be disqualified on that basis alone. I have already unsubscribed, and will not be reading any more of his posts after this one.
It may have been sarcasm but the main point is that the contextual uncertainty is one of the potential ideas I have presented for communicating under totalitarian conditions. Communication online would need to evolve beyond rearranged L3tter$ for spam bots to bypass the YT et al. algorithms. It might be useful for people to start contemplating such ideas more deeply.
I can’t tell whether or not your comment is sarcasm, but regardless of which is the case, it is an interesting theory. But it is almost certainly wrong. After reading and re-reading this post a few times and reading most of his comments here, it is pretty obvious that he has swallowed the official narrative of 10/7, hook, line and sinker. If he is in fact sympathetic to the 10/7 Truthers, he did such a poor job of conveying that that he should be disqualified on that basis alone. I have already unsubscribed, and will not be reading any more of his posts after this one.
It may have been sarcasm but the main point is that the contextual uncertainty is one of the potential ideas I have presented for communicating under totalitarian conditions. Communication online would need to evolve beyond rearranged L3tter$ for spam bots to bypass the YT et al. algorithms. It might be useful for people to start contemplating such ideas more deeply.