I hope I get your point. My point is: how on earth can an uprising against violent oppression be sucessfull without being allowed to use violence itself? Jeremy Scahill's article shows just that. 'Tyrannenmord' needs a murder and a murderer.
Not nice, no. But if I only focus on the murder of the tyrant, what am I doing? Audiatur et altera pars.
I hope I get your point. My point is: how on earth can an uprising against violent oppression be sucessfull without being allowed to use violence itself? Jeremy Scahill's article shows just that. 'Tyrannenmord' needs a murder and a murderer.
Not nice, no. But if I only focus on the murder of the tyrant, what am I doing? Audiatur et altera pars.
No, you don't get the point. Try reading the column you are replying to again and responding to what I'm actually lampooning, i.e., the "Hamas didn't mass murder anyone because the Israelis 'Hanniballed' them all" nonsense.
I hope I get your point. My point is: how on earth can an uprising against violent oppression be sucessfull without being allowed to use violence itself? Jeremy Scahill's article shows just that. 'Tyrannenmord' needs a murder and a murderer.
Not nice, no. But if I only focus on the murder of the tyrant, what am I doing? Audiatur et altera pars.
No, you don't get the point. Try reading the column you are replying to again and responding to what I'm actually lampooning, i.e., the "Hamas didn't mass murder anyone because the Israelis 'Hanniballed' them all" nonsense.