UPDATE: Three hours ago, "Gilgamechit" asked: “would be fair if you responded to the [7/07/24] Haaretz report itself, at least as a preamble to what is otherwise a strawman argument against the likes of Aaron Mate ...”
CJ Hopkins replied: I thought it was a good article.
After writing my previous comments, I realized that C.J. was largely …
UPDATE: Three hours ago, "Gilgamechit" asked: “would be fair if you responded to the [7/07/24] Haaretz report itself, at least as a preamble to what is otherwise a strawman argument against the likes of Aaron Mate ...”
CJ Hopkins replied: I thought it was a good article.
After writing my previous comments, I realized that C.J. was largely writing satire and trying to ridicule the propaganda of "both sides"? I now feel like I was playing the "straight man" in a comedy sketch.
"Instead of today's satire, C.J. wrote, "... I’m going to drop the sarcasm for now, and say a few things for the record. Maybe just to get this out of my system." Gives you a better idea of where he's coming from."
UPDATE: Three hours ago, "Gilgamechit" asked: “would be fair if you responded to the [7/07/24] Haaretz report itself, at least as a preamble to what is otherwise a strawman argument against the likes of Aaron Mate ...”
CJ Hopkins replied: I thought it was a good article.
After writing my previous comments, I realized that C.J. was largely writing satire and trying to ridicule the propaganda of "both sides"? I now feel like I was playing the "straight man" in a comedy sketch.
Except the comedy sketch wasn't funny
This piece was a satire, angry, and heavy on sarcasm. Last night, I read CJ's 10/15/23 post "Israel's 9/11" https://cjhopkins.substack.com/p/israels-911
"Instead of today's satire, C.J. wrote, "... I’m going to drop the sarcasm for now, and say a few things for the record. Maybe just to get this out of my system." Gives you a better idea of where he's coming from."