Discussion about this post

User's avatar
CJ Hopkins's avatar

I made this offer to a reader below. It is open to anyone who objects to my use of the term "global capitalism" and demands that I use a different term (e.g., "corporatism," "cronyism," etc). If you can provide A Brief History of [Your Term] that explains the emergence of [Your Term], its evolution into a globally-hegemonic system in the 19th to 20th Centuries (including WWII and the Cold War), and its continued evolution in the 21st Century, and outline the dynamics currently at play (i.e., why it's going totalitarian now, and the forces arrayed against it, and their relationship to it), based on [Your Term]'s essential features and historical trajectory, as I have done with global capitalism, I will start using your term.

schnides14's avatar

I find myself thinking a lot about a passage from David Remnick's book "Lenin's Tomb," which chronicled the final days of the Soviet Union. Remnick rode rampant over that bloated country's sickly corpse, and like a good agent of Empire, he now rides at the vanguard of the GloboCap force facing up against the manufactured opposition C.J. so eloquently describes, again, in this piece.

“To win a post at the institute, Dina had to take an entrance exam. Around that time he had read in samizdat Solzhenitsyn’s essay Live Not By the Lie. The essay recognized the difficulty, even the impossibility, of outright rebellion in a totalitarian state; instead, it implored the reader at least to refuse cooperation in the lies of the state. Better not to be a journalist than to write the lies of Pravda. Better not to teach history at all than to read The Short Cause to young minds. Preserve yourself even if you cannot save the world.”

I don't know what to do at this point. The forces arrayed against us are so powerful, and pervasive, that I can't honestly see a way through other than going down for the long nap. Fight where you can, obviously, and yet...

186 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?